The review should be between 5 and 6 pages long (double spaced, Times New Roman, 12 font, 1 inch margins).Your review should be both descriptive and analytical. Compare and evaluate the articles by following these guidelines:Provide an overview of the issue under considerationDivide the three works into categories (e.g. those in support of a particular position, those against, and those offering alternative theses)Explain how each work is similar to and how it varies from the othersConclude by suggesting which work makes the greatest contribution to the understanding and development of the subject.In assessing each piece, consider the following:Are the author’s arguments supported by evidence? Is the evidence reliable?Is the author’s perspective even-handed or prejudicial? Is contrary data considered and is certain relevant information ignored?Are the author’s arguments and conclusions convincing?Does the work contribute in any significant way to your understanding of the subject?
- Discuss Over under and through by Tana Hoban.
- Managing Xerox’s Multinational Development Center.
- Write a Spireslack field report.
- Discuss “Gates of Paradise” by Lorenzo Ghiberti.
- Describe Mechanical vibrations with viscous damping.
- Discuss Barbara Tyson Mosley.
- Discuss The problems in the global industrialised food system.
- Describe The Roman Colosseum.
- What did Orientalism do to the act of translation?
- Read and critique Hitchcock’s (2015b) paper.