You have read the article by Nicholas Blomley (2015) titled ″The Right Not to Be Excluded and the Struggle to Stay Put.″ In the article, he argues we have to rethink property, moving away from the restrictive definition of property (as ″private″ property) to a more relational, social understanding of property (hint: commoning). He focuses on the right not to be excluded. Keeping this idea in mind, think about your own neighborhoods or places where you live or have lived. What values, feelings and spaces and experiences do you associate with establishing a sense of belonging in your neighborhood or in a place that provides this sense of community, if any? How does this relate to Blomely′s discussion of property and the right not to be excluded? Finally, how do you understand the right not to be excluded? And, how would we, following Blomely (2015) and Nembhard’s (2008) discussion of common and cooperative ownership, claim a right to the city? Professor Nicholas Blomley writes about “the right to the city” through the analysis of property right and property regimes. Why is it important to analyze property and not to make invisible that “property” is socially constructed? It is created both through how we conceptualize property “to give people standing in the world,” the meaning and dreams / aspirations we attach to it, and then how we encode rights to property in law? How does Blomley’s (2016) reframing of “the right to the city” as “the right not to be excluded” (5) work? What might it mean in practice? Don’t use big vocabulary Write a simple essay Also do a mind map