1.What is constitutionalism? How is it relevant to comparative constitutional law? In what way are Confucian and Islamic constitutionalism distinctive? How do the debates about the EU Constitution and about global or cosmopolitan constitutionalism influence your answer? Draw in your answer on Ackerman’s article, and more generally on the literature we read in the second part of the course. (600 words)2.What is the anti-discrimination approach and how does it work? Use Canada as an example. (300 words)*sources: attached in files: Dorsen: pp. 617-23, 626-32, 644-61. Andrews v. Law Society of British Columbia (Canada) 3. Is there, or could there be, such a thing as Confucian or Islamic constitutionalism? In what way is it/could it be a form of constitutionalism? In what way is it/could it be distinctive? (300 words)4. What exactly does Kumm argue? What is he in favor of, exactly? What is “cosmopolitan constitutionalism”? How far can you agree with him? (600 words)* sources: Chapters by Fassbender and Kumm in Dunoff and Trachtman, Ruling the World? attached in the filesI have attached all the necessary documents necessary to complete this assignment. It is not difficult and you just need to answer the questions based on the readings attached. But it requires full understanding and reading of the documents. It is a very important paper so please do not hesitate to contact me if you have any questions.