The final work product should be a legal memorandum that articulates whether colleges and universities have a legitimate interest in promoting diversity.Write a 5 page paper in which you do the following:1. Review the concept of judicial review, and explain the fundamental manner in which the case of Marbury v. Madison gave the Supreme Court the power of judicial review to determine whether or not colleges and universities have a legitimate interest in promoting diversity and in doing so, do not violate the equal protection of law clause found in the Fourteenth Amendment of the constitution.2. Interpret the following quote from Supreme Justice Sandra Day O’Connor: “The path to leadership must be visibly open to talented and qualified individuals of every race and ethnicity.” This is an excerpt taken from the Grutter opinion. Provide a rationale for the interpretation.3. Specify whether or not you believe Justice O’Connor’s claim that twenty-five years from now, the use of racial preferences will no longer be necessary to further the interest of promoting diversity in colleges and universities.4. Review the court’s decision in Grutter v. Bollinger and determine whether the court acted in any fashion in order to improve the system of checks and balances that exist to ensure that a school’s race-conscious admission programs do not unduly harm non-minority applications.5. Use at least three quality references.LINKS TO EACH CASE: https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/539/306/ https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-supreme-court/5/137.html