How have the courts applied the 1st Amendment to election law cases? You must discuss cases from at least two different electoral issues (e.g, don’t just use campaign finance cases). Be specific as you use cases to elucidate and substantiate your discussion. Question 1: Use ALL THESE CASES FOR PROBLEM 1: Democratic Party of the United States v. Wisconsin ex rel. LaFollette, 450 U.S. 107 (1981), Tashijan v. Republican Party of Connecticut, 479 U.S. 208 (1986), Buckley v. Valeo, 424 U.S. 1(1976), Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission 558 U.S. 310 (2010)3. Discuss the similarities and differences in how the courts have dealt with reapportionment and redistricting issues. You must address issues of equality of voting and whether equality refers to partisanship and/or race. Question 3. USE ALL THESE CASES Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S 186 (1962), Wesberry v. Sanders, 376 U.S. 1 (1964), City of Mobile v. Bolden, 446 U.S. 55 (1980) ,Thornburg v. Gingles, 478 U.S. 30 (1986), Davis v. Bandemar 478 U.S. 109 (1986 )4. Dissents in major cases often provide a preview of what, with a change in SCOTUS membership, will eventually become majority decisions. Discuss this statement by referencing at least two areas of judicial decisions.Question 4: INCLUDE ALL 4 OF THESE CASES: FIRST PAIR TO COMPARE DISSENTS: Plessy v. Ferguson, 163 U.S. 537 (1896) and Brown v.Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954)SECOND PAIR TO COMPARE DISSENTS: Wolf v. Colorado,338 U.S. 25(1949) and Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961)Citation rules:In general, the first time you use a case, list out the entire name (e.g., McConnell v. Federal Election Commission) with a footnote entry for its citation (540 U.S. 93 (2003)). The next time you reference the case, you need only, without footnote, list a uniquely identifying term (e.g., McConnell). The FEC is not unique. It gets sued all the time. **USE 3 PAGES FOR EACH ANSWER***