NO need to do a paper, just answer the questions directly, but the reference has in APA format. No abstract paperPart 1:Find a legitimate Quantitative Article and answer the following questions:What problem was addressed? What was the purpose of the study? What theoretical or conceptual framework was used? If none specified, what might they have used? Method: What was the research design? Was it rigorous, appropriate, etc. Explain your response.Method: What was the population of interest? Identify and Describe Method: What was sampling design? How many were sampled? Was this the best design & sample size? Was power analysis used? Explain your responses. Method: What was the setting? Was it well explained? Appropriate to question, population of interest, etc? Explain why Method: How were data collected? List variables and how they were measured. Was this the best way to measure the variable? (Explain). Were instruments (data collection tools) well explained? Is there evidence of reliability and validity (explain).Method: Procedures– If an intervention, was it described? Did the data collection process minimize bias? Were staff trained in data collection? Were ethical considerations addressed, how? Results/data analysis: How were data analyzed? Appropriate statistical methods? Control variables? Type I & Type II errors avoided or minimized? Results/findings: What were the key findings? Was there info re statistical significance, confidence intervals & effect size presented? Results: Your summary assessment- what do you think of quality of research? Were there limitations (stated or ones you recognize)? Do you have confidence in the “truth” of the results?Implementation of research: Could/would you use this as basis for changing practice? Why or why not? Is research sound? Sufficient? Note that there has to be an APA formatted reference Part 2: Find a legitimate Qualitative Article and answer the following questions:What problem were the researchers addressing? 2. What was the purpose of the study? What theoretical or conceptual framework was used? If none specified, what might they have used? Method/design: What was the research design/tradition? Enough time spent? Reflexivity? Method/population & sample: What was the population of interest? Adequately described? How did they sample? Adequate description? Best method? Adequate size? Was saturation achieved? Method/setting: What was the setting? Adequate description? Method/data collection: How were data collected? Appropriate? Right questions or observations to answer? Enough data? Depth, richness? Method/procedures: Were data collection & recording appropriate? Was biased minimized in the data collection process? How? Were data collectors trained?Method/enhancement of trustworthiness: What strategies were used? Adequate? Qualifications of researchers enhance confidence in findings & interpretation?Results: How were data analyzed? Was approach compatible with tradition & nature & type of data? What was yield? Did analytic procedures suggest bias? Results: What were key findings? Effectively summarized with good excerpts/support? Do themes capture the meaning of data? Themes well conceptualized? Insightful, etc? Results: Your summary assessment- what do you think of quality of research? Trustworthy? Confidence in truth of results? Implementation of research: Could/would you use this as basis for changing practice? Is research sound? Sufficient? Meaningful evidence? Note that there has to be an APA formatted reference