1.Consider you mini-paper as a rehearsal for the final paper. Unless you decide to take on a completely new topic, your final paper (due on the finals week) should be an improved (upon my comments) and expanded version of your mini-paper (due on week 10). 2.You are free to choose your own topic, e.g., if you are fascinated with the concept of the phenomenal transparency, you are free to dedicate the entire paper to this subject.3.If you are hesitant to choose your own topic, I would like to suggest you structure your paper as a debate between different interpretations of the same pieces of architecture, such as, for example, sociologists’ critique of architects’ failure to address the users’ concerns, and architects’ attempts to address deep philosophical issues. Below are a few possible approaches:•Discuss the avant-garde’s attempts to challenge existing norms vs. users’ complaints that their requirements were not met (consider, among other sources, Greenberg’s and Gutman’s essays) •Discuss earlier-twentieth-century architects’ fascination with “literal” transparency in the context of W. Benjamin’s and M. Foucault critique.•Discuss the seventeenth century debate between the “ancients” and the “moderns” as a prelude to the debate between “spectacular” architecture and non-representational design techniques. •Discuss the search for origins as a philosophy, which, between the early eighteenth century and the middle of the twentieth century drove much of architectural theory discourse. Explain the essence of J. Rykwert’s and R. Krauss’s criticism of the notions such as “origins” and “originality?” 4.Style: refer to “critical writing guidelines” (see, “Mini-Paper”, in “Assignments”).5.Sources: one of the main purposes of this exercise is to learn how to draw from multiple—and somewhat contradictory—sources. Make sure that you cite no less than two (preferably three or four) different pieces of architectural theory. However, for your mini-paper, you should be able to use only those essays that we have discussed during our Virtual Debates. For the final paper, you will be required to compliment them with your own independent research—but we will discuss it closer to the end of the term.

- Food in Health Promotion Objective: This discussion post aims to explore the concepts of hunger and food insecurity, and to analyze nutrition assistance pro
- You must submit a resume and an document of 250 -500 words that describes how you embody Saint Leo University’s Core Values and how the scholarship will ass
- You must submit a resume and an document of 250 -500 words that describes how you embody Saint Leo University’s Core Values and how the scholarship will ass
- Analyze the difficulties and challenges health disparities can bring to clinical decision-making for providers and patients. Discussion posts must be a mini
- Organizational and Management Theory
- Imagine?you are a project manager for a large hospitality firm (for example, Marriott International) who will be in charge of the firm?s HQ office relocatio
- Briefly describe your experience during this course. This can include any type of group of psychotropic medications you consider you will use more in your f
- Select and identify a culture other than your own. In what ways will you have to modify your communication approach, your nursing tasks, and your patient ed
- Post?the following:? Identify the organization you selected. Describe the practice or organization issue you selected. Explain how SDOH relates to the
- HR’s role is to monitor and modify corporate culture. What are two effective ways HR can do this? Explain why you believe these particular methods are effe