Current Approaches and Alternatives: In this section, you will consider the current counterterrorism approaches of the country in which the attack occurred and discuss possible alternatives.
Explain how the country’s overall counterterrorism approach has changed or evolved since the attack.
Summarize arguments that exist for and against the country’s current counterterrorism approach.
Using your research, determine if the country’s current counterterrorism approach is an effective one. Defend your conclusion.
Describe a possible alternative to the country’s current counterterrorism approach.
Explain the potential long-term impact of the alternative approach on preventing future terrorist actions.
Attached is the rest of the paper for reference
Rubric
Current Approaches and Alternatives: Counterterrorism Approach Meets “Proficient” criteria, and explanation demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of the country’s past and present counterterrorism approach Explains how the country’s overall counterterrorism approach has changed or evolved since the attack Explains how the country’s overall counterterrorism approach has changed or evolved since the attack, but explanation is cursory or contains inaccuracies Does not explain how the country’s overall counterterrorism approach has changed or evolved since the attack 3.39
Current Approaches and Alternatives: Summarize Arguments Meets “Proficient” criteria, and response provides keen insight into arguments supporting and opposing the country’s current counterterrorism approach Summarizes arguments that exist for and against the country’s current counterterrorism approach Summarizes arguments related to the current counterterrorism approach, but summary does not include both sides of the argument, or response is cursory or contains inaccuracies Does not summarize arguments that exist for or against the country’s current counterterrorism approach 3.39
Current Approaches and Alternatives: Effective Meets “Proficient” criteria, and defense demonstrates a complex grasp of the effectiveness of the country’s current counterterrorism approach Determines if the country’s current counterterrorism approach is effective and defends response Determines if the country’s current counterterrorism approach is effective but does not defend response, or defense is illogical Does not determine if the country’s current counterterrorism approach is effective 3.39
Current Approaches and Alternatives: Alternative Approach Meets “Proficient” criteria, and descriiption demonstrates a sophisticated awareness of possible approaches to terrorism Describes a possible alternative to the country’s current long-term counterterrorism approach Describes a possible alternative to the country’s current long-term counterterrorism approach, but descriiption is cursory or illogical Does not describe a possible alternative to the country’s current long-term counterterrorism approach 3.39
Current Approaches and Alternatives: Future Meets “Proficient” criteria, and explanation provides keen insight into the potential future impacts of the alternative approach Explains the potential long-term impact of the alternative approach on preventing future terrorist actions Explains the potential long-term impact of the alternative approach on preventing future terrorist actions, but explanation is cursory or illogical Does not explain the potential long-term impact of the alternative approach on preventing future terrorist actions 3.39
Articulation of Response Submission is free of errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, and organization and is presented in a professional and easy-to-read format Submission has no major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization Submission has major errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that negatively impact readability and articulation of main ideas Submission has critical errors related to citations, grammar, spelling, syntax, or organization that prevent understanding of ideas 4.99
Total: 100%