Choose one of the following arguments (A or B), and explain what claims would need tobe supplied to make a valid argument. (maximum 100 words)A. Wax argument (adapted from Meditation 2)- If you put a piece of wax by a fire, it changes all its sensible properties.- You still recognize that it is the same piece of wax.- Your recognition does not come from the senses or imagination.- You know the nature of wax by purely mental scrutiny.- Conclusion: the nature of mind is better known than that of body.B. A proof of God’s existence (adapted from Meditation 3)- All ideas, considered as modes of thought, are the same.- Ideas differ in terms of what they represent, however.- Some ideas have more objective reality in them than others.- I have an idea of God as an infinite substance.- There is more reality in the idea of an infinite substance.- Conclusion: God necessarily exists.3. According to Descartes, “There is … no doubt that God could have given me a naturesuch that I was never mistaken” (p. 44). Briefly explain why, accordingto Descartes, God didn’t just make us so that we never made mistakes.4. Pick, from the list of metaphors* below, one that you take to be especially interesting orimportant for understanding Descartes’ thought.