The goal is to present contrasting arguments using information from credible sources and to evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of these positions using content from the course.As you put this together, are you following the critical analysis process that we emphasize in critical reasoning? This means fairly considering all research equally before reaching a conclusion.Your rough draft should include 1–2 paragraphs for each of the following elements:Introduction: Identify the issue/topic. Provide the necessary background and important recent developments. Define key terms and concepts.Arguments and Counterarguments: Summarize the best arguments on both sides of the issue. Include relevant research from credible sources used to support each conclusion.Evaluation of Critical Thinking: Assess the strength of the arguments and the quality of thinking surrounding this issue.Identify weaknesses in critical thinking such as fallacies, rhetorical devices, vague language, and cognitive biases. Provide specific examples of how these weaknesses appear in arguments, using terminology and definitions from the courseEvaluate the quality of scientific and anecdotal evidence using the standards of inductive and deductive reasoning described in the course. Consider the quality of causal relationship, analogies, generalizations, and/or moral reasoning.Conclusion: Analyze the totality of research and offer a critical thinker’s response to the issue. Identify your own position and experience with the issue and explain how your thinking of the subject has evolved as a result of your analysis.You must use a minimum of 5 research references in APA Style and include in-text citations in your paragraphs. Include a minimum of 3 academic peer-reviewed books or journal articles. Other sources may be used as supplemental sources, such as journalistic, government, web-based, or media sources. Sources should not include dictionaries, encyclopedias, or general information websites like Wikipedia. Consult your instructor regarding any source of which you unsure. Use the WCU Library as your best resource.Review the rubric for specific grading criteria.Points: 80
- Use the internet to investigate Russian and American cooperative involvement with the International Space Station. What have both countries contr
- Name and describe at least two non-traditional healing systems Discuss the interface between religion and mental health Religion, Healing and
- Watch and annotate the videos of one peer as assigned by your instructor on InTASC Standards 1, 2, and 3 of the Clinical Practice Rubric. * Use t
- Discuss some of the elements in women?s approach to power, negotiation, and risk-taking that may lead to them earning less than men in similar jo
- Explain how your organizational design and culture could be implemented at your workplace or organization. Explain how your design will improve
- You need to develop a specific activity that is for the vignette that you chose. You also have to list all the rules, all the consequences, and all the materia
- The student will provide a description of the administration, logistics, and planning for a sport ministry project of the student?s choice. The portfolio must
- For this assignment, you have just been hired as the new Head Coach (of your particular sport) at Amos University! First…Your Bad News You have inherited a t
- The CEO of your organization wants to improve employee morale. Recently, she went to a conference at which she heard people talking about ?open-book management
- Maya has just been hired as the chief executive officer (CEO) to turn around Phoenix Solutions, a once-thriving tech company now struggling with declining reve