PurposeThe purpose of this assignment is to assess your ability to:Discuss the roles of law enforcement agencies.Compare and contrast opportunities and challenges of technological tools in crime prevention and detection.Assess law enforcement’s constitutional due process obligations to those they survey and arrest.Analyze the consequences of due process violations for police, offender, and society.OverviewNew technologies in detection, surveillance, and prevention include automated license plate readers (ALPR) systems, facial recognition software, neighborhood cameras, crime mapping that identifies geographically predisposed high risk neighborhoods, and historical analytics. Law enforcement also reports using social media for investigative and prosecutorial purposes. To successfully complete the assignment, you are expected to read and study the key points and all assigned readings for this module. It is highly recommended that you familiarize yourself with the grading criteria provided. This criteria includes information on how your professor will grade your assignment. Ensure you cover all relevant information expected of you in the assignment. Use at least two outside reference sources to support your writing.Critically analyze the following article:https://www-tandfonline-com.links.franklin.edu/action/doSearch?AllField=Technology-Mediated+Exposure+to+Police%E2%80%93Citizen+Encounters%3A+A+Quasi-Experimental+Assessment+of+Consequences+for+Citizen+Perceptions ()The link will take you to this page:New Technologies Action Items, summarize the article. Within your summary, identify the analytic method, sample size, theoretical framework, findings and limitations. Keeping the findings of the study in mind, pick one technology from the list below, describe: 1) how it enhances public safety and 2) a criticism that may result from its use.Shot spotterRed light traffic camerasTruNarcLicense plate recognition softwareDronesArtificial Intelligence and Machine LearningBodyworn CamerasTactical RobotsStarChase TechnologyYour response should be detailed and supported by at least three appropriate, reference sources other than the course textbook.Your paper is to include your name, the assignment name and number, the course and section number, and the date on your title page. Format your title page, paper, and cite ALL sources according to APA guidelines.Submit your assignment to Turnitin. Give yourself enough time to revise and resubmit ahead of the due date.By the due date indicated, upload your final work to Turnitin.RubricNew TechnologiesNew TechnologiesCriteriaRatingsPtsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContentRequirements of the assignment; clarity of main idea; relevancy to content; quality of content50.0 to >44.0 ptsProficientThe student answers all of the required questions in the assignment. Main ideas are very clear. Content is all relevant to the material learned in the class/textbook. Content is correct and of high quality.44.0 to >41.0 ptsAcceptableThe student answers most of the required questions in the assignment. Main ideas are generally clear. Content is generally relevant to the material learned in the class/textbook. Content is generally correct and of high quality.41.0 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe student answers none or only some of the required questions in the assignment. Main ideas are confusing or somewhat confusing. Content is irrelevant or somewhat irrelevant to the material learned in the class/textbook. Content is incorrect or somewhat incorrect and of low quality.50.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAnalysis/SynthesisAnalysis of the information; synthesis of information and materials40.0 to >35.0 ptsProficientThe student provides abundant evidence of analysis; the information is understood and integrated well. Synthesis of information and materials provides abundant evidence of critical thought.35.0 to >33.0 ptsAcceptableThe student provides evidence of analysis; the information is understood and integrated overall. Synthesis of information and materials provides evidence of critical thought.33.0 to >0 ptsUnacceptableThe student provides no or only some evidence of analysis; the information is not understood and integrated well. Synthesis of information and materials provides no or only some evidence of critical thought.40.0 ptsThis criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA, Grammar, and Mechanics (No more than 10% of assignment total points)10.0 to >9.0 ptsProficientThe assignment follows APA guidelines for writing skills, formatting, citing, and referencing sources. The assignment contains no notable spelling, grammatical, and/or other errors.9.0 to >8.0 ptsAcceptableThe assignment consistently follows APA guidelines for writing skills, formatting, citing, and referencing sources. The assignment has few spelling, grammatical, and/or other errors.8