Write a professional report critiquing the methodological approaches used to complete the risk assessments. Your report should include: A brief overview of the organisation and rationale for the selection of the three hazards; Critical evaluation of the factors that influenced the selection, design, development and implementation of the risk assessments; Critical evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the chosen approach used in each risk assessment; Recommendations of how the risk assessments can be improved The three risk assessments and any supporting documents should be added as an appendix to your report. If you chose qualitative risk assessment, then why was that suitable?Who was/would be involved in the risk assessment process and why were they/would they beinvolved? Who could have been involved and what were the strengths and weaknesses of involvingthem?How was the risk assessment implemented/would it be implemented (along with its controlmeasures) and what were the strengths and weaknesses of that approach? Plenty to say here. 2Has the risk assessment been updated/how would it be updated and what was/would be theprocess for that change? What might be the strengths and weaknesses of that approach?Consider aspects such as the working environment, level of risk posed by the hazard and type ofstaff involved.Use guidance documents from the grey literature, but you must also draw from the journals whereyou can find relevant articles.4. Critical evaluation of the strengths and weaknesses of the chosen approach.Has the risk been reduced sufficiently (as low as reasonably practicable), is the assessment ‘suitableand sufficient’ (see lecture slides), have relevant guidance and UK legislation requirements beenmet?Is there evidence about the chosen approach in the literature that you can use to support yourevaluation and discussion?Use guidance documents from the grey literature, but you must also draw from the journals whereyou can find relevant articles.5. ConclusionConclusions arise logically from the work you have already done. You shouldn’t present any newinformation here. Just use the information you have collected to inform the options, indicators,lessons or advice you wish to give the readers.6. RecommendationsWhat could be done to improve the risk assessment approach? Give specific recommendations, preferably with timescales attached. Back these up with reference to the literature where possible7. References8. Appendix – The three risk assessments go in the Appendix and not in your assignment aboveRisk Assessment 1References for risk assessment 1Risk assessment 2References for risk assessment 2Risk assessment 3References for risk assessment 3Include any scoring matrix you choose to use.

- While traditional marketing methods are the cornerstone of any organization’s growth, creativity, and innovation, within traditional marketing is a definitive way of e
- Using the same company and annual reports that you chose for your Reading and Using the Annual Report Case Study discussion forum in Week 1, PEARSON? Prepare a comp
- This case study will grant you the opportunity to utilize your critical thinking and data analysis skills. In business, surveys are often a common way to gauge consume
- Create a 3-5 minute Kaltura audio, video(speaker notes needed) , and slide presentation that provides a final report on your data analysis project. Introduction: Heal
- Assessment 5 NCHL Leadership Self-Assessment, Reflection, and Personal Development Plan Instructions: ?Assess the development of your healthcare leadership competencie
- Tips for Communicating in Health Care Administration
- There are definitely cultural aspects of growth and development for every phase or cycle of our lives. In Chapter 3, the goal of Healthy People 2020 is to improve cost
- Purpose: To present a full intake with comprehensive treatment plan. Instructions: 1. With your partner, combine parts 1, 2, & 3 into one document.? 2. Together, use f
- In adults with mental illness residing in U.S. Mental Health Professional Shortage Areas (P), does offering integrated telepsychiatry services through primary care cli
- Which contextual factors will promote getting your advocacy priority on the agenda?? Which contextual factors might work against it?