Resources should be within the past 5 years. PurposeThe process of project management has five phases: (1) design and initiation, which you just completed; (2) finalizing your plan before implementation, which you will do now; (3) implementation; (4) monitor and control; and finally, (5) evaluation and lessons learned, as well as knowledge transfer.During Phase 2 (finalizing the project plan), you will continue to create the tools and documents you will need when you implement your project as the project manager in Phase 3.Week 4: Communications PlanWeek 5: Deliverables and Critical Success Factors (CSFs)Week 6: Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and Gantt ChartWeek 7: Risk Management and Human Resource Management PlansIn this assignment, students document, track, and manage a project’s risks and use of human resources. The risk management will be accomplished through the use of a Risk Register chart.Using the Risk Register is a way to identify, document, and manage all the risks associated with a project. The chart details provide an easy way to scan for the level of risk, status, potential responses, and who is responsible for the risk, in addition to the project manager or other details needed to manage the risk. This is a great way to keep everyone informed when this document is presented at the weekly team meetings and in communication with all stakeholders.Another key tool is called the responsible, accountable, consulted, informed (RACI) chart, which helps you identify who is responsible for, accountable for, consulted on, or informed about each major project task. The RACI chart will help manage and track use of human resources; this facilitates monitoring and control and provides one means of communication. It documents and makes clear who is responsible for bringing the task to completion, on time, and on budget.RequirementsComplete the Risk Register and RACI documents for your project. Attach them as appendices to a professional, scholarly paper.Grammar, spelling, punctuation, references, and citations must be consistent with formal academic writing and APA format as expressed in the current edition of the APA manual.Preparing the paperAll project risks must be identified and added to your Risk Register following the example. Attach them as appendices to a professional, scholarly paper 92 pages).This order is a continuation of the following orders:Order ID: 373187677NR631 Week 5: Deliverables and Critical Success Factors (CSF)Order ID: 463430624NR631 Week 4 Communication Plan – 3 pages* Order ID: 827384325NR631 Week 3: Literature Review – 5 pagesNR631 Week 2: Project Scope and Charter –

- While traditional marketing methods are the cornerstone of any organization’s growth, creativity, and innovation, within traditional marketing is a definitive way of e
- Using the same company and annual reports that you chose for your Reading and Using the Annual Report Case Study discussion forum in Week 1, PEARSON? Prepare a comp
- This case study will grant you the opportunity to utilize your critical thinking and data analysis skills. In business, surveys are often a common way to gauge consume
- Create a 3-5 minute Kaltura audio, video(speaker notes needed) , and slide presentation that provides a final report on your data analysis project. Introduction: Heal
- Assessment 5 NCHL Leadership Self-Assessment, Reflection, and Personal Development Plan Instructions: ?Assess the development of your healthcare leadership competencie
- Tips for Communicating in Health Care Administration
- There are definitely cultural aspects of growth and development for every phase or cycle of our lives. In Chapter 3, the goal of Healthy People 2020 is to improve cost
- Purpose: To present a full intake with comprehensive treatment plan. Instructions: 1. With your partner, combine parts 1, 2, & 3 into one document.? 2. Together, use f
- In adults with mental illness residing in U.S. Mental Health Professional Shortage Areas (P), does offering integrated telepsychiatry services through primary care cli
- Which contextual factors will promote getting your advocacy priority on the agenda?? Which contextual factors might work against it?