Overall use direct textual evidence (utilized in the form of quotations with correct citations) must be used to support your position. Papers that do not use direct textual evidence will incur a 20-point penalty.The following sources are not acceptable for use: Wikipedia, YouTube, Diffen.com, Quora, SparkNotes, Philosophy Now. Use only the website I provided Keep in mind Merely having an opinion does not make said opinion justifiable, defensible, or even good. As such, your paper would need to advance reasons you hold your position. Do NOT give personal examples and other anecdotal evidence when writing argumentative papers. I do not mean to suggest your relationships or experiences are trivial, only that we’ll need to keep the papers focused on the prompts.In academic writing it is generally advisable to write from a position of near-certainty regarding one’s own position, meaning you should avoid language that implies hesitancy on your part. In other words write, “I assert…” “It is my position…”; NOT “I hope in/feel/believe.” The latter implies you aren’t sure what you’re arguing, or that your position is too wishy-washy.Finally, because this is a formal assignment, please use formal language throughout the course of your paper. Do not use contractions and Internet lingo.Use this website as your source : https://philosophy.ucsc.edu/news-events/colloquia-conferences/GeneologyofMorals.pdf Read Essay One: Read Parts 1-12Essay Two: Read Parts 1-10Essay Three: Read Parts 1-7*These are mostly be optional, though they can be very useful for you if you’re writing the topic on Nietzsche.After reading those , base the argument off of this topic question : 3.) A Re-evaluation? Nietzsche is often read as offering powerful criticisms of traditional or commonly held beliefs of morality. To what extent are his criticisms valid and, more importantly, what does this mean for us? Are ethics and morality a waste of time, or is there still hope in a “re-evaluation” of values?