Choose the bad argument then follow prompt.Why was the original argument flawed (i.e. what logical fallacies did it commit, and/or what was weak about the structure, evidence, or credibility of the argument)?How did those flaws impact the argument? Who was more or less likely to believe the author or take action because of the way the argument was written?Why is the stance the author takes worth considering? In other words, prove the author’s point without committing the same errors in logic the author did.