Part 1: What are the different ways in which historians have looked at “periodizing” the history of globalization. Put another way, when do different historians think globalization starts? Part 2: Using historical evidence from the articles assigned for the final and/or the readings you have done in this course, when do you think historians should begin the history of globalization. Is it new? Old? What factors should historians consider in defining globalization? (culture, economics, environment, etc.?) To complete the final exam, you should incorporate, at minimum, 2 articles from below and draw upon the course readings we have complete throughout the semester. 1. Jeremy Adelman. “What is global history now.” Available here https://aeon.co/essays/is-global-history-still-possible-or-has-it-had-its-moment. 2. David Northrup. “Globalization and the Great Convergence: Rethinking World History in the Long Term.” Available on BB and here: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20079329 3. Michael Lang. “Globalization and Its History.” Available on BB and here: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/511251. 4. Adam McKeown, Marx, Engels, Robert Park, M. F. Millikan, W. W. Rostow and Manuel Castells. “Periodizing Globalization.” Available on BB and here http://www.jstor.org/stable/25472911.