: Was there any info missing? Was there anything important noticed that was not mentioned? What could have made it better?Introduction:What was the object of the study? Was the hypothesis made clear?Was the review of literature accurate and thorough? Were there any gaps in the literature mentioned? Is it clear why the study is needed and relevant?Sampling:Who are these patients?Where were the patients found? When were these people recruited?What pathology did these patients have?Was the inclusion criteria adequate, and did it make sense? Was there anything else you’d like to see included?Methods:How was the study structured? Blind? Double-blind?Was the study comparing two groups, or one group and a placebo?How were the participants split into groups?Who was performing the treatments?How were the techniques performed? What specifically was being done in each of the study groups?Does the method seems to make sense given the hypothesis?Are these measures appropriate? Is there anything else you would like to have seen? Results:Do the results cover everything that was explained in testing?Are the tables and graphs clearly labeled?Are all participants accounted for?Was there anything interesting to note in the results section?Discussion:Are the treatments described and its pathology?Is their study comparable to other studies?Do they state their flaws? Is there anything they could have done better? What restraints did they have with their study?What was able to be controlled?What studies are needed in the future?Is there clinical significance to the study discussed?Do their conclusions logically follow the results?Are the authors comments justified based on the results?Conclusion:Did they summarize their findings?Is their conclusion based on their hypothesis?What should be done in future studies?