Stephen Greenblatt, et al., The Norton Anthology of English Literature, 10th ed., Vol. B: The Sixteenth Century and The Early Seventeenth Century!!!Francis Bacon, from Essays; from The Advancement of Learning; from Novum Organum (1213-31)Based bacon’s views on language based on the above reading, present a critical argument(ex). on how his interpretation of use of language is skewed and how he also uses flowery language to persuade others that his claim is correct) with the discussion of at least 2 relevant secondary articles that dates no further than last 20 years.Please use one of the source attached ( bacon and art of misinterpretation) and one other ( it can be your choice or the ive attached) Final Paper InstructionsGeneral GuidelinesLength: 8-12 pages, double-spaced, 12 pt. Times New Roman font or equivalentDue Date (Please note new due date): May 7th (by 11:59pm)InstructionsIn this paper, you will present a critical argument about one or more texts from the syllabus and support this argument with discussion of at least two relevant secondary articles. Unlike the first paper, you should prioritize your own argument about the primary text over the synopsis and analysis of the secondary materials. But you should nevertheless integrate such Write on a major text Paradise Lost or The Duchess of Malfi, Once you have selected an appropriate topic, you still must do the work of forming, articulating, and supporting an original critical perspective on that topic. See the discussion of critical arguments above.Finding Appropriate Secondary TextsOnce you have decided on a topic, you should select two or more articles or book chapters concerning the text and general themes that you discuss in the paper. It will probably be easiest to search by text name and topical keyword (for instance, “Lycidas” and “sexuality”). In order to make sure you are able to find a critical source relevant to your interests, I will not ask that the article be published in the last 20 years as I did with the first paper. However, if you have the option, it will usually be better to select the most recent relevant article. Articles before roughly1980 may prove especially problematic as they often operate under different disciplinary norms and assumptions.I encourage you to seek out secondary articles after you have selected a topic but before you have settled on the final form of your argument. Consulting with the archive of secondary literature may help give direction and shape to your thinking on your chosen topic