• Commissioner of Taxation v Pike [2020] FCAFC 158.1 • Commissioner of Taxation v Healius [2020] FCAFC 1732 • Eichmann v Commissioner of Taxation [2020] FCAFC 1553 • Greig v Commissioner of Taxation [2020] FCAFC 254 • Bywater Investments Limited & Ors v. Commissioner of Taxation [2016] HCA 45.5 The report will be due by midnight (AEST) on Friday, 15 January 2021. Submissions MUST be made via Turnitin. Please ensure that your case analysis does not exceed the 2500 word limit (excluding footnotes and bibliography). In preparing the case analysis, please ensure that you refer to the Prescribed Textbook and the Recommended Reading and Resources listed in the Course Outline. You should also refer to any relevant materials from the Secondary Sources listed in the course outline as well as the materials posted on Moodle by your lecturer (e.g. the Reading and Analysing Case Law Aide, the Legal Essay Checklist and the Legal Writing Resource). These supplementary resources will assist you in conducting your analysis of the case you choose as well as writing your views about the case in question. Students are being asked to undertake this assessment task to encourage the development of a range of skills as indicated by the assessment criteria. The assessment criteria are as follows: • Clear and concise statement of the relevant facts and legal issue(s) in the case. • Clear and concise expression of own ideas about the case using appropriate legal language. • Careful organisation so that ideas develop logically through the analysis. • Thoughtful analysis of the judgement(s). • Correctness of grammar, spelling etc. • Adherence to principles of academic honesty with regard to the preparation and submission of assessments. • Management of own workload to meet deadlines (self-assessment) Please read through and think about these criteria so that you are clear about how your work is going to be assessed. If you have any questions or require assistance please e-mail the Unit Co-ordinator at claudia.andrea.mitchell@imc.edu.au.
- QSO 321 Module Two Journal Guidelines and Rubric
- In this assignment, you will explore important considerations for culturally competent business practices, which can help strengthen and maintain relation
- You are to read the section identified and conduct your own external research before crafting your submission. In the discussion, you are to answer the
- Read Josie King’s story: https://www.healthleadersmedia.com/clinical-care/josies-story-teaches-hospitals-how-become-safer Read the following safety techni
- Change in an Organization This chapter involves change and the response to change in an organization. If you feel uncomfortable already you probably are i
- Is your clinical change project highly significant to nursing? Does the project encompass the core graduate nursing competencies of patient-centered care,
- For this assignment you are going to identify a complex healthcare ethical dilemma facing the professional nurse in our multi-dimensional healthcare envir
- When I compared the techniques, the main difference between t-tests and ANOVAs is the number of means being compared. T-tests are limited to two means, wh
- According to Moore et al. (2021) the role of statistical tests are to analyze relevant statistical data to test hypothesis, observe patterns and to obtain
- Should the United States reconsider its approach to combining scholastic education with athletics? Should students who are not progressing acceptably in a